Urgent referrals from primary care to dermatology for lesions suspicious for skin cancer: patterns, outcomes, and need for systems improvement.

Ideally, urgent dermatology referrals for evaluation of a lesion concerning for skin cancer should be triaged and processed with appropriate urgency by primary care and dermatology, respectively. We performed a retrospective single-institution study by conducting chart reviews of all dermatology referrals designated by primary care as urgent for evaluation of a lesion concerning for skin cancer. We identified 320 referrals placed between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Dermatology encounters for these patients occurred on or before 30 days for 50.6% of referrals and on or after 31 days for 38.4% of referrals, with 10.9% never completed. The percentage of all races excluding whites, non-Hispanic in the delayed appointment group (≥ 31 days) was 15.1% higher (95% CI 5.3-24.9) than in the timely appointment group (≤ 30 days). Similarly, the percentage of non-English languages in the delayed group was 7.1% higher (95% CI 0.5-13.7) than in the timely group. Overall, 15.8% of these referrals yielded diagnoses of malignancy, while 76.8% and 7.4% resulted in benign and pre-malignant diagnoses, respectively. The primary care team documented referral status (i.e., completed, incomplete, or pending) during their subsequent visits with the patients in only 37.5% of these referrals. Our findings demonstrate the need to improve the reliability of urgent referrals to ensure they occur in a timely manner with confirmation of "referral loop" closure at the referring clinician's end.

Timeline: The Evolution of Fellowship Training in Micrographic Surgery and Dermatologic Oncology.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) granted accreditation to the first 5 Procedural Dermatology Fellowship Training Programs in 2004. The name of the training program was changed from Procedural Dermatology to Micrographic Surgery and Dermatologic Oncology by the ACGME/Residency Review Committee for Dermatology in 2014. The American Board of Dermatology/American Board of Medical Specialties conducted the first certification examination in Micrographic Dermatology Surgery in October 2021. This article chronicles the history and development of the subspecialty. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):861-863.: doi:10.36849/JDD.6933.

Moving forward with teledermatology: Operational challenges of a hybrid in-person and virtual practice.

Since the COVID-19 outbreak, teledermatology services have become an integral part of our daily practice. In this study, we compared three practice models of an academic department in an urban setting: 1) in-person only, 2) teledermatology only, and 3) hybrid of in-person and teledermatology. Our study demonstrated that older patients prefer in-person visits over teledermatology visits, while non-English-speaking patients prefer teledermatology visits over in-person visits. In addition, teledermatology services can be better utilized for evaluation of acne and psoriasis, as these diagnoses do not require in-person reevaluation, unlike the evaluation of concerning lesions. Considering these findings, our study highlights the need to continuously examine our practice models to understand patient preferences, overcome practice-driven barriers, and ensure the sound allocation of limited health care resources.

Systems engineering analysis of diagnostic referral closed-loop processes.

BACKGROUND: Closing loops to complete diagnostic referrals remains a significant patient safety problem in most health systems, with 65%-73% failure rates and significant delays common despite years of improvement efforts, suggesting new approaches may be useful. Systems engineering (SE) methods increasingly are advocated in healthcare for their value in studying and redesigning complex processes. OBJECTIVE: Conduct a formative SE analysis of process logic, variation, reliability and failures for completing diagnostic referrals originating in two primary care practices serving different demographics, using dermatology as an illustrating use case. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, systems engineers, quality improvement specialists, and patient representatives collaborated to understand processes of initiating and completing diagnostic referrals. Cross-functional process maps were developed through iterative group interviews with an urban community-based health centre and a teaching practice within a large academic medical centre. Results were used to conduct an engineering process analysis, assess variation within and between practices, and identify common failure modes and potential solutions. RESULTS: Processes to complete diagnostic referrals involve many sub-standard design constructs, with significant workflow variation between and within practices, statistical instability and special cause variation in completion rates and timeliness, and only 21% of all process activities estimated as value-add. Failure modes were similar between the two practices, with most process activities relying on low-reliability concepts (eg, reminders, workarounds, education and verification/inspection). Several opportunities were identified to incorporate higher reliability process constructs (eg, simplification, consolidation, standardisation, forcing functions, automation and opt-outs). CONCLUSION: From a systems science perspective, diagnostic referral processes perform poorly in part because their fundamental designs are fraught with low-reliability characteristics and mental models, including formalised workaround and rework activities, suggesting a need for different approaches versus incremental improvement of existing processes. SE perspectives and methods offer new ways of thinking about patient safety problems, failures and potential solutions.

A Multidisciplinary Approach and Review of Safety Recommendations for Plastic Surgeons during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are N95 Masks Enough?

SUMMARY: The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic presents a unique challenge to the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Although plastic surgeons may be postponing elective operations, there are still a number of emergent or urgent procedures that may need to be performed, and surgeons may be facing the reality of returning to a new normalcy of operating with coronavirus disease of 2019. These procedures, consisting of those such as head and neck reconstruction or maxillofacial trauma, largely require a multidisciplinary approach and may be considered of higher risk to health care workers because of the involvement of areas of the body identified as sources for viral transmission. Moreover, viral transmission may potentially extend beyond respiratory secretions, which has been the main focus of most safety precautions. The authors aim to present the scope of these procedures and the means of viral transmission, and to provide safety precaution recommendations for plastic surgery and its related disciplines.

Nicotinamide for Keratinocyte Carcinoma Chemoprevention: A Nationwide Survey of Mohs Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Nicotinamide has been shown to reduce keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) in high-risk patients in a randomized controlled trial setting. Data on nicotinamide's use for KC prevention are limited. OBJECTIVE: To characterize nicotinamide prescribing patterns among Mohs surgeons. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed 1,500 members of the American College of Mohs Surgeons regarding their demographics, use of nicotinamide, and safety perceptions. We performed multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate correlations between physician characteristics and nicotinamide prescribing habits. RESULTS: 76.9% of survey respondents recommend nicotinamide for KC prevention. Twenty percent of respondents have recommended nicotinamide to more than 100 patients in the past year. Forty-five percent of respondents report a duration of use of 2 years or more in their patients. 63.8% of respondents had no concerns over nicotinamide's safety with long-term use. Individuals who answered "yes," "maybe," or "uncertain" to having safety concerns over long-term nicotinamide use and individuals in practice for more than 10 years were less likely (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.71 and OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05, 0.82, respectively) to have recommended nicotinamide to patients for KC prevention. CONCLUSION: Given the widespread nicotinamide use among Mohs surgeons, additional studies on nicotinamide cost-effectiveness, safety, and use patterns are needed.

A single-institution retrospective evaluation of Mohs incision angles and histopathologic specimen quality.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, Mohs layers are excised using a beveled incision to facilitate tissue flattening for tangential sectioning. Some surgeons perform non-beveled incisions; however, these specimens may be harder for the histotechnician to process. Limited data exist comparing slide quality between these techniques. METHODS: Retrospective review of cases performed by two Mohs surgeons (surgeon 1 = non-beveled incision; surgeon 2 =  beveled incision) using different incision angles between June 2014 and December 2016. Daily histopathologic slide quality assessment scores (maximum score = 5, minimum score = 1) of the day's first case were compared. RESULTS: About 536 slides (surgeon 1 = 277, surgeon 2 = 259) were evaluated from 2,825 cases. Mean quality assessment scores were similar between surgeons (4.89 and 4.86; P = 0.31) with missing or folded epidermis being the most commonly reported issue for both surgeons. CONCLUSION: Similar slide quality can be achieved via both beveled and non-beveled Mohs cutting angles. While more relaxing incisions may be necessary to optimize tissue flattening with non-beveled incisions, there is no associated increased loss of epidermal margins. The potential benefits of non-beveled incisions, such as minimizing tangentially cut adnexal structures and creating vertical wound edges optimized for repair, may offer an alternative technique with positive clinical implications.

Examining the prior authorization process, patient outcomes, and the impact of a pharmacy intervention: A single-center review.

BACKGROUND: Dermatology experiences a disproportionately high burden of prior authorizations (PAs). OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a centralized pharmacy intervention on the PA process and the impact of PAs on patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of PAs submitted for medications before and after implementation of pharmacy intervention was conducted. RESULTS: PA was required for 8.1% of all prescriptions. PAs were most frequently submitted for topical steroids, topical antibiotics and antifungals, and topical retinoids. Most common indications included acne, psoriasis, and dermatitis. Biologic agents (55.2%) and brand-name only medications (42.8%) required PA at higher rates. Pharmacy intervention resulted in shorter time to PA submission (4 days vs 1 day, P < .001) and decision (6 days vs 1 day, P < .001) and higher approval rates (63.9% vs 80.6%, P < .001) but did not decrease the total number of PAs. Patients with approved PAs had higher likelihood of disease improvement vs those with denied PAs (71.1% vs 58.0%, P = .013). LIMITATIONS: Data were collected from a single academic institution. Patient medication compliance was not assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The current PA process may result in delays in care and a negative impact on patients. A centralized pharmacy intervention is an effective measure but does not eliminate the overall burden of PAs.